Research and Links to Stories we follow Friends of the Show Advertise About the Show Video Blogs Podcasts Listen Live Contact Us Listen Live Sign up for the Peak Lifestyles Newsletter Home | The Wall Street Shuffle Home | The Wall Street Shuffle Listener Appreciation Night June 8, 2012

Author Archive for Dan Cofall

And so it begins…

Monday, May 7th, 2012

5-7-2012

We are either insiders or outsiders.  Insiders have done well over the last thirty years.  Outsiders have not seen a real increase in personal wages in thirty years and household income has increased only because the “nuclear” family self-destructed and two-earner families became the common solution to inflation, evaporating company retirement plans, skyrocketing education costs and healthcare costs increasing three times faster than personal incomes

You need only to take a moment to inflation-adjust your net worth and compare 2012 to 2002 and 1992 to validate this trend.  But, since 1992, our government and our Federal Reserve have made it increasingly impossible to perform this simple exercise as they have ever more frequently found ways to officially understate inflation, overstate growth and overstate employment, both in numbers of Americans employed and how much each job pays.  The money supply is no longer honestly reported and $16T in loans to foreign nations and foreign banks have been created at the push of a button with nobody the wiser.

We take inordinate amounts of time and media bandwidth to vet democrats and republicans, conservatives and liberals.  We know that all politicians are crooks and thieves…except for our own.  Most politicians don’t even claim a party affiliation in their ad campaigns.

Our representatives battle over debt ceilings, pipelines, gunrunning, job creation and spending.

Yet, it is often virtually unanimous when voting to abridge our constitutional rights.  The first, second and tenth amendments are the most frequent targets but it is still early.  Why don’t we ask why our senate can agree 97-3 to anything, as they just did with a bill last week that significantly restricts our ability to assemble and protest or a bill that cedes more control over the Internet to our government?  Personal freedoms and liberties have been under assault since before the Patriot Act but the pace is quickening.

Don’t we remember that the Patriot Act was to be used only to prosecute terrorists but now its provisions are common tool used to prosecute virtually any crime?

This, however, should not be a surprise.  Liberties must be curtailed as our finances become more uncontrollable.  The Senate has not passed a budget in more than three years.  Our national debt will have ballooned to nearly $17T by the 2012 election, up from $10T just four years earlier.  Unemployment and underemployment have not been higher since the Great Depression.  The percentage of Americans who pay no federal income taxes has never been higher.  Fifty million Americans are on food stamps, one sixth of our country.  It has been more than ten years since we have had so few Americans in the workforce.  Manufacturing represents less than 9% of our total economy.  Our trade deficit is near record highs.  And taxes are scheduled for one of the largest increases in our history on January 1, 2013, just two months after our election.  Let’s also not forget the incalculable fiscal and human costs of Obamacare.

If elections truly reflect the will of the voters, this weekend, 52% of voters in France elected a new president, Francois Hollande.  Most notable is that President-elect Hollande does not support the EU’s proposed austerity for high debt countries, such as France.  He is a “pro-growth” candidate…but who isn’t?  It is how you pursue that growth that is critical and Francois is a high tax, government growth socialist.

Some of his proposals include raising the minimum wage, hiring 60,000 more teachers, and lowering the retirement age from 62 to 60.  He also promised to raise taxes on big corporations and those making more than $1m euros per year.  It sounds so familiar.

And so it begins.  Not surprisingly, Greece is about to follow the same path.  This weekend, the Greek election resulted in the party that structured the bailout and the austerity plan coming in third place while the anti-austerity party took second and a “conservative” party coming in first.  This means that austerity is out in both Greece and France.  This is devastating to the Euro.

In Germany, Angela Merkel’s party has suffered significant losses in parts of the country further complicating any real hopes for a solution to the problems of the EU.

At least for France and Greece, the answer is clear.  This will become a huge drag on the Euro and any hopes for a true EU debt rescue plan.  The EU is even more fragile now.  China should be very concerned about its largest trading partner and we should be concerned about China.  Yet, rest assured, that no matter who wins our election this fall, central bankers and politicians here will follow the very same path.

As has been said many times, central bankers and politicians have one thing in common.  They both want to keep their jobs.  To do so, they will use the only real tools they have.  Bankers will print and politicians will spend.  All central bankers and all politicians will retreat to their comfort zones.

Rest in comfort knowing that our deficits are not under control, we are in a negative real growth mode and that QEIII will soon ride to the rescue.  And it will only be a sign of things to come.  American’s will not embrace austerity.  The long anticipated and discussed civil disobedience is near.  Black military helicopters over our cities are now reported in the nightly news.  They are no longer a punch line to a bad joke.  Our laws are changing at an accelerating pace and personal freedom and rights are being trumped by faceless regulators and their cancer-like regulations.

Surprising no one, the news reports that many wealthy French now seek to move their assets and even their citizenships to countries other than France, due to the expected confiscatory taxes.  I expect other citizens of other countries to follow.  I expect that many of our listeners and readers have considered this and more than a few are probably executing their plans now.

Of critical importance is the fact that you will not hear this discussed in open forums.  Much the same way that a bullion owner will not discuss how they store their bullion, no one will discuss what their personal strategies will be.  By the time that these strategies become widely discussed, the regulations will be in place to severely limit your options.  Time is not our friend.

Ask yourself just one question.  Why are laws passed, with nearly unanimous consent, laws that significantly restrict our liberties and freedom, while virtually all other bills stall?  Is it possible that our government knows that the debt is unmanageable, that the dollar is being intentionally debased and that America has real enemies that need not fire a shot to bring us to our knees?  Is it possible that there will not be a 2012 election?

Part Two of this series is coming…

The Cofall Curve: Why Government Spending & Jobs Are Burden

Tuesday, December 27th, 2011

The following is an article from the WSS “Vintage Vault” originally published on May 10, 2010, we were right then and we are right now

Smaller is better…really…

If there was ever a time to make a more compelling case for smaller government, this is it.We are in the midst of a slow motion, economic dream sequence wherein a rapidly aging work force yields declining personal consumption. There is a virtual absence of any wage pricing power, predominantly due to the effects of globalization on a maturing economy and an education system that now ranks 14th in the world and getting worse. Short-term deflationary pressures will tip the hand of the Fed and debt monetization will become the norm. Property values continue to decline and taxes at all levels of government continue to decline.Deficits are unsustainable and will soon become unserviceable if we have any hope of retaining any semblance of dollar purchasing power.

Our options are quickly diminishing but every scenario requires, at its very core, smaller government at every level.

Yet this is much more about the financial viability of the Republic as opposed to a political position. In 1980, our national deficit was about $1T. Today, it is in excess of $14T. This is a GDP to national debt ratio of 1:1. This is third world territory, at least according to the International Monetary Fund (not one of my favorite sources, however). Both parties are responsible for this debacle.

As our economy continues to contract, only the most “experimental” economists (“Keynesian” if you prefer) believe that increasing taxes will right the ship and increase wages and employment. This leaves us with only Hobson’s Choices (a choice with equally negative alternatives) and each and every scenario includes shrinking government.

The Cofall Curve

It is imperative that a simple and irrefutable case be made directly to the American public.

Simply, there are certain essential costs a society must bear – these costs are represented on the X-axis and are percentages of our GDP. Currently, our total federal government spending is approximately 30% of our GDP. This number approaches 50% when you consider state, regional and local government spending.

Certain benefits to our society are derived from these expenditures and these are represented on the Y-axis. Essential services yield significant social benefits. Yet, at some point, government spending becomes discretionary and detrimental. Beyond this point, each dollar of government spending has a greater than one dollar of negative effect on society. The negative effects include inefficient allocation of capital to the essentially administrative public sector and the equally inefficient and insufficient capital allocation to the productive private sector.

For example, private sector jobs and public sector jobs are not the same. There are essential government jobs that, without which, our economy and our quality of life suffer. Soldiers, food inspectors, intelligence gatherers, law enforcement, fire and rescue, some legislators and other value added public sector employees.
However, past a certain point, the benefit of these employees is overshadowed by the cost to and burden on a society. Bureaucrats, paper pushers, administrators, regulators, layers of middle management, employees doing the jobs that the private sector can do more efficiently, some legislators…these are all examples of costs and not benefits to society.

Take for a moment the very simple fact that it takes the taxes paid by 5 to 10 private sector jobs to pay the cost of just 1 public sector employee. Recent data suggests that total compensation to each public sector employee is approximately $120,000 -double that of the $60,000 compensation for each private sector employee. Let’s say the average private sector employee cost is $60,000, including taxes and benefits. That employee pays about $9,000 in federal income tax. The average public sector employee costs $120,000, including benefits. This means that it takes 13 private sector jobs to pay for the cost of just 1 government employee. For the moment, we will ignore excess state and local taxation and employment, though this curve works at all levels.

The benefit to our society of essential public sector employees vastly out weighs the costs…what price can you put on our military, our intelligence community or food inspectors, just to name a few? Remember, first responders and teachers are the fiscal responsibility of local, regional and state governments. Yet, once we begin to hire federal governmental employees merely to create jobs, we burden the private sector with unnecessary taxes, more national debt and a devalued currency based upon merely printing money…monetizing the debt. We must levy ever more taxes just to service the debt created by excess public sector employment.

At the apogee of this curve, the benefits to our society out weigh the costs. Beyond this point, each marginal government employee becomes a huge burden. Every public sector job added beyond this point burdens society with excess costs as well as the almost incalculable additional fiscal burden upon the private sector created by these massive bureaucracies and the resulting red tape and excessive and conflicting regulations.

Once we begin to equate a public sector job to a private sector job, we loose sight of how many private sector jobs are lost paying for just that one public sector employee. At this point, conventional wisdom becomes counter-intuitive. Past the peak of the cost-benefit curve, the greatest benefit to society becomes reducing government employees and not creating “make-work” jobs. This means fewer burdens on tax revenues, more capital available for private investment and more private sector job growth.

Due to the leverage of the number of private sector jobs necessary to support a public sector job, our economy is dramatically and negatively affected by surplus governmental employment.

The debate about how large our federal government should be is as old as our country. This argument becomes more essential as federal spending dramatically escalates at the same time as federally mandated state spending is bankrupting virtually every state. And states can go bankrupt. Remember, states do not have printing presses. But these excess public sector employees will find abundant jobs in the private sector as tax payers, who no longer bear the financial burden of make-work government employees nor the excessive regulatory and bureaucratic pressure, will create new businesses and consume more due to having more disposable income.

The essential problem is that we have relied upon the fallacy of Keynesian economic policies for so long, it seems so logical that if we have high unemployment we should put these unemployed to work for the government. An essential element in this debate is that public sector employees generally administer society while private sector employees generally produce things and services of transactional value. Don’t believe this? May I ask the last time you asked the government to invent anything, to sell you a gallon of gas, to brew a cup of morning coffee for you or build a house for you? When is the last time you asked a machinist to renew your driver’s license, asked a dentist to put out a fire or asked a bartender to record a deed? And, yes, this example does not take into account the amazing accomplishments of our military and intelligence communities and DARPA that have created everything from the Internet to space travel. Remember, we said that there are such things as essential government employees.

We need to resist the “benevolence” of excess government spending and the unneeded public sector employment at exactly the wrong time. We cannot fall for the trap of substituting the immediacy of “feel-good” public sector employment producing virtually no long term benefits for the more difficult to create yet more sustainable and valuable private sector job growth. This will be one of the most difficult decisions a politician or central banker will every make – bring on the “Big Reset” now, face the financial pain now and shorten the recovery time OR make the easy choices, kick the can and grow government. This should separate the statesmen from the politicians.

Comments (0)

70

Wednesday, August 17th, 2011

8-17-2011

Though we may not still be the raving capitalists we once were here in America, we still find the “socialist” label offensive and in direct conflict with philosophies of our founders.  Socialism is, for better or worse, ”…an economic system in which the means of production are publicly or commonly owned and controlled cooperatively, or a political philosophy advocating such a system.   As a form of social organization, socialism is based on co-operative social relations and self-management; relatively equal power-relations and the reduction or elimination of hierarchy in the management of economic and political affairs.” (borrowed shamelessly from Wikipedia)

No matter what Newsweek proclaimed on their cover a year or so ago, we are not all Socialists now.  We abhor a collective mentality and we reject the systematic elimination of a highly competitive environment.  We do not believe that the State knows better what we should do and how much we should be paid and to whom that pay should be redistributed to.

Americans have always longed for the crack of the bat that wins the World Series or the explosion of pads colliding during a winning touchdown.  We love elections where great candidates fight for a hard won victory.  We embrace the fact that wars must sometimes be fought to preserve freedom.  And we know that freedom is the natural kryptonite of Socialism.

Socialists are never free.  We have fought wars and will fight wars for our freedom and the freedom of millions around the globe.

Ok, you say, so what?  Here is what.

The magic number “70” is the number of members of the 111th Congress who are members of the Democratic Socialists of America (“DSA”).  These are not just politicians who vote left of center; these are card-carrying members of “The Democratic Socialists of America”.

What exactly, you might ask, do these folks believe in?  In their own words, “DISCOVER AND CREATE 21ST CENTURY SOCIALISM FOR BUILDING BRIDGES OF UNITY. WE ARE AN EDUCATIONAL AND INTERACTIVE GROUPING NETWORK GEARED TOWARDS PEACEFUL, PROGRESSIVE, AND RADICAL WORKS BASED SOLELY ON THE U.S. PERSPECTIVE.”

But we are not Socialists, you say, so why do I care?  Are we on a witch-hunt?  Good question.

Do you care that our Congress has 70 of 435 members (16%) who are Democratic Socialists?  Do you care that 11 of 23 (48%) Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee are Democratic Socialists?  These are the folks to whom we have entrusted our judicial confirmations.

Please allow me to introduce our DSA members (as of 10/1/09):

Co-Chairs


Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)

Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)

Vice Chairs


Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33)

Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18)

Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02)

Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)

Senate Members

Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT)

House Members


Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)

Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)

Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)

Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)

Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)

Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)

Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)

Hon. André Carson (IN-07)

Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)

Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)

Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)

Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)

Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)

Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)

Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)

Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)

Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)

Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)

Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)

Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)

Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)

Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)

Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)

Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)

Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)

Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)

Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)

Hon. John Hall (NY-19)

Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)

Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)

Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)

Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)

Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)

Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)

Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)

Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)

Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)

Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)

Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)

Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)

Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)

Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)

Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)

Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)

Hon. George Miller (CA-07)

Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)

Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)

Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)

Hon. John Olver (MA-01)

Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)

Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)

Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)

Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)

Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)

Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)

Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)

Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)

Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)

Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)

Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)

Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)

Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)

Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)

Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)

Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)

Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)

Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)

Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)

Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)

To read more about this organization or to see the source of this list, go to http://www.scribd.com/doc/35733956/DSA-Members-American-Socialist-Voter-Democratic-Socialists-of-America-10-1-09.

Please note that this list was compiled as of 10/1/09 and some members are no longer United States Congressmen.  But this list is indicative of a Congress heavily influenced by socialists.

In fact, you may have noticed that Rep. Barney Frank, infamous from “Dodd-Frank”, the massive overhaul of our entire financial system, is a DSA member.  Does that concern you even just one little bit?

How about Rep. Charlie Rangel, so responsible for so much of our existing repressive and stifling tax code and a member who was one of only 23 House members to ever be censured for everything from tax code violations to unreported income?  Remember, he wrote much of our tax code.

How about Rep. Ed Markey who voted to not count Ohio’s 34 electoral votes in 2004?

These are but a few of our national leaders who subscribe to the philosophies of Socialism yet who exercise vast influence over our daily lives and our economy.

When you have that nagging feeling that Congress’ current approval rating of 10% is still overstated and you feel that our government is just not listening to you, you may just be right about that…at lease for the folks on this list.

When will we care who we ask to lead us, whether it be in Congress or in the White House?

Comments (0)

8-1-2011

No matter how the markets open today (Dow futures are up 170 right now), it is no better than a flip of a coin.  Nothing is yet real nor is it likely to become real anytime in the near future.

These sham negotiations have taken the country to the brink; all in the name of special interests over the interests of the Republic.  Just because all parties are “unhappy” with the compromise doesn’t mean this is a heroic agreement.  Consensus seldom breeds innovation and genius is not born from “shared sacrifices”.  This process has been and is shameful.  536 career politicians cannot look beyond constituencies and 2012 to do their jobs as elected representatives.

This “plan” (as of Sunday night at 9pm) consists of $1T in cuts so back loaded into the 10-year cycle that they have a virtually insignificant net present value as well as about $1.4T in cuts to be named by a to be named committee.

We currently have nearly $15T of national debt.  That is about 7 times the taxes the federal government takes from all sources.  This bill will raise that number to more than $17T by the 2012 election!  This will be 8 times all taxes.  And, much to the displeasure of our progressive friends, raising taxes now would be suicidal.  It is not as though our rates are low or $2.2T in revenue won’t run the country.

May I remind any progressives that $2.2T in taxes did run the country…just 3 years ago in 2008!

After watching the despicable acts of the big three credit rating agencies during the mortgage collapse debacle, I could care less who they rate and how they rate them.  They should have been put out of business three years ago.  This, however, does not change the fact that they will downgrade American debt…and rightly so.  We deserved to be downgraded years ago but we got a pass just like commercial and investment banks…and AIG (more on the unheralded criminals that emerged from the 2008 collapse later this week).

Our folks in Washington would not have needed to build in “triggers” in this legislation to invoke “painful” cuts if they had addressed these obscene deficits and debt years ago.

Never once have they put their retirements and salaries on the line as we do everyday.

Never once do they correctly distinguish between entitlement programs that have been funded (though not fully funded) by mandatory payroll deductions from our paychecks and welfare programs for people, including illegal immigrants, who have contributed nothing yet who continue to be a burden to our society.

Never once do they address the absolute critical mission of our military and that is keeping us alive and safe.  The military’s mission should not be nation building.  The only thing that separates us from being just another broke, third world dung hole is our ability to project absolute military superiority across the globe.

This may sound too jingoistic or heavy handed but world peace is a fantasy.  Those who have not will always want to take from those who have and only our military stands in their way.  The only way to truly have a strong dollar, assuming we overcome our abject profligacy, is to carry the biggest, baldest stick in the world and for the world to believe that we would use it.

So what did our 536 folks do?  They made the military one of the trigger cuts.  Should agreement not be reached on future cuts, the military and Medicare take a huge hit.

In the name of “compromise”, we will continue to fund entire departments that should be eliminated.

In the name of “compromise”, we will put a band-aid on Social Security and Medicare yet continue to pay benefits to non-contributors, means-test recipients and offer no privatization option.  By the way, Chile has quite successfully privatized its retirement programs, should anyone suggest that it couldn’t be done.

There has been no discussion about the massive burden of ObamaCare…has anyone even commented on that?

And, since the bill will be ramrodded through in the dark of the night, what legislative and regulative surprises do we face?  What additional freedoms will we now forgo?  What new costs will we bear to spend our own after-tax dollars?

Solutions to our debt problem are not difficult.  Each of you could do it with a line item veto, a little economic and financial training and no desire to stand for re-election.  It is no harder than balancing your family’s finances but with just a few more zeros.

You certainly would not lie to the American people and tell them that they must continue to contribute to a broken system while you “transfer” their wealth to social non-contributors.  You would not support nation building when our country needs help first.  You would not unilaterally disarm yourself.  You would not prohibit energy resource exploration and drive up costs.

You would not do any of this so why vote for politicians who do?

No matter what agreement is or is not reached this week, our debt will still be huge and out of control.  Our politicians won’t address it again until after the election.  Our debt will be downgraded and our interest rates will rise.  Our unemployment will remain at hugely painful levels.  Our liberties will continue to be abridged.

Until we elect statesmen and hold them accountable, this process will not change.

By the way, those of you holding precious metals don’t be surprised if they bounce around in the short term.  But never have I been more concerned about our dollar nor our debt or country and never have I been more optimistic about precious metals.

Comments (0)

“Rights are a Slippery Thing”

Monday, July 25th, 2011

7-25-2011

OK, here comes the big “false flag”.  Let’s begin to worry about the white, middle class, Mason next door instead of other countries or terrorists.  Apparently, the man arrested for this twin massacre in Oslo is said to have had “Masonic” ties.

Let’s raise the fear level to Oklahoma City levels.

Let’s prepare the country for martial law and FEMA and gun control.  Let’s put gun control under an international authority…say…the new UN treaty that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has told the world that we will adopt.  I know that just about anybody looks better than our current president to become our next president but don’t be fooled.  Many, including Clinton, are no more supportive of our constitutional rights than Mr. Obama is.

But you have to make the country want it first.

Who would not want to stop this from happening here?

Might I suggest that LESS gun control would have prevented the massacre outside of Oslo?  There were no weapons in the hands of the ordinary people.  Let’s just say that gun ownership is tightly controlled and focuses mainly upon hunting and shooting sports.  This guy kept shooting for more than 1 hour with no resistance, killing 93 and wounding 97.

Had he been in Texas, I give him 2 minutes tops.

But this is a really dark omen for personal liberties in the US.  Notice that Norway is taking a very pro-democracy stand by stating that terror will be met with more democracy…just the opposite from what we have experienced in the US post Oklahoma City and 9-11.  They understand the grievous danger to a Republic if freedom is exchanged for security.

Keep these thoughts in mind as the story develops.  And remember, just as Janet Napolitano (“Director of Homeland Security”) has said, homegrown terrorists are our big concern now.  Add that to the recent statements by the Director of National Intelligence (“DNI”) stating that the Muslim Brotherhood is neither a religious organization nor an organization that sponsors terror. Tie it all together with “false flag” attacks and only white, middle-aged Americans will become the target of “See something, say something”.

As more and more regulations and laws further restrict our God given freedoms, lets take a look at the law that requires that foreign financial institutions “withhold” 30% of monies withdrawn from foreign accounts if the institutions will not disclose all personal financial information about the depositor to the US government.

Did you know that this act, the “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act” or “FATCA” was contained WITHIN the “Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act” or “HIRE” bill?  Could you have imagined that a bill that presumes that you are a tax cheat simply by having money in a foreign bank account would be written INSIDE a bill that was supposed to fund employment opportunities (even though it funded virtually no job creation)?

The good news is that the implementation of this new law has been delayed and this still gives you time to optimize your financial planning, including international diversifications, if you so choose.  See a qualified tax and estate planner for the most up to date information.

I bring these two issues up because the country we all love so much is quickly becoming a country that intends to control and manage every liberty we thought we had.  We have not asked for this nor do we want this.  This is a government seeking control and power beyond our wildest dreams.  They want to monitor and manage every aspect of our lives through regulations and “hidden” laws.

Our government wants to restrict what we do with money that we have earned and already paid taxes upon.  They want us to keep it within the country.  They insist on driving the value of our currency into the ground and then control how we try to protect ourselves from this process.  They want to know exactly where our assets are even though we have already paid taxes upon these earnings.

This is a very important point.  This is not about assisting the IRS in finding untaxed income, which I think most Americans do support.  This is about knowing where your “after-tax” assets are so that these assets may be taxed again or pilfered by our government.

This is not the country I grew up in.  I used to be amused when I would talk to people visiting from foreign countries and they would say how far down the socialist or fascism road we have traveled.  They would say they knew because they had escaped from a country that had a system just like the one we are developing.  Instead of moving bravely into a capitalistic and constitutional society, we continue to slide feet first into the muddy abyss that is fascism.

Please do not dismiss the word “fascism” as merely provocative.   From Webster, “Fascism is a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.”  Virtually every new law or regulation enacted is one more step in that direction, including what you can do with your own after-tax money.

Comments (0)

Don’t Make Me Keep Listening if You are Wrong

Monday, July 18th, 2011

7-18-2011

Does it bother you when people get their facts wrong and then continue to build an argument as if even if the conclusion were to end up correct, it could be anything but sheer dumb luck?  Folks say that I get too hung up on details or particular phrases but words have meaning.  Why finish a race if you were disqualified at the start?

I have plenty of examples.

What about when someone confuses millions, billions and trillions?  (It is not always obvious what they meant though I’m pretty sure millions are like pennies…just not very relevant right now.)

How about when someone says, “Even if we have 9.2% unemployment, 90.8% of Americans are still employed?  (Unemployment is based upon the workforce, not the population.  Our workforce has not been lower since WWI at around 122M.  About 190M out of 310M people living in America are not employed BLS U-3))

How about, “Our debt to GDP is really only 60%.”  (Total federal dent is $15T, including $6T of internal and $9T of external debt.  Internal debt is money that our government has pilfered from the Social Security and Medicare Trust funds.)

And then there is the great tax statement, “Tax rates have never been lower.”  (Rates are only part of the equation.  We have consistently lowered the deductions along with rates so the net effect is fairly neutral.  For nearly 50 years, taxes as a function of GDP have been about 20%, give or take a percentage or two.)

“Social security is solvent through 2xxx (pick any year).”  (There is no money in any trust fund and there really never has been.  It has been pilfered by our government, no thanks to Al Gore.  Any money paid to any recipient must be taxed, borrowed or printed.)

“Manufacturing is up sharply.”  (Manufacturing today is about 8% of our economy.  Even a very small increase can be referred to as “sharply” off of this low a base.)

“The US can’t go bankrupt.”  (Even with a printing press at its disposal, it is possible.  If the government prints a new dollar and no one will take it, we are bankrupt.)

“It’s not a loss until you sell.”  (Please tell me this needs no explanation.)

How about the one half statistic such as, “X,XXX new jobs were created last month.” without saying what the net was?  (We only care about net jobs because we need to consistently create net new jobs, net of jobs lost, in the 200-300k per month range just to keep up with our population growth and labor force.)

“Inflation was X.X%” and that number was anything even close to 2%?  (“Core” inflation excludes just about everything that is volatile, including energy and food.  But it does include housing and housing is very deflationary right now, giving a false sense of low inflation.)

Let’s not forget the mention of ANY rescue or stimulus plan from the US or the EU? (It’s all printed or borrowed.)

And the most egregious and telling quip,“Gold isn’t money.”  Thank you, Mr. Bernanke.

These and many other sound bite and politically motivated phrases are like a match to fumes to me.  When I hear this twaddle, I stop listening and do my best to ask the speaker to say what he or she really means.  I’d rather not interrupt but I’d rather more appreciate not being talked to as if I neither care nor know the difference.

Is it rude to make people make sense when they talk?  I believe that it is ruder to make me put on an Academy-winning performance and act as if I care if they won’t even try to get the easy stuff right.

(By the way, Gold (spot) just hit $1599.90 in overnight)

 

 

Comments (0)
UA-737746-7